tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3808484.post109911542959892988..comments2023-10-28T07:26:09.479+01:00Comments on Les said, the better: Measure QCharles Céleste Hutchinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18123138871494922485noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3808484.post-1099249493624272482004-10-31T19:04:00.000+00:002004-10-31T19:04:00.000+00:00i dunno what the chicken bones are about. I imagi...i dunno what the chicken bones are about. I imagine that it's people eating/living in their cars that just throw trash everywhere. For the first year or two I lived in my condo, people living in RVs would dump their sewage in the gutter right out front. I think they stopped once they realized the buildings were occupied and they might be disturbing people / get a ticket. But I also thought the condoms were from people who were just happy to see each other, so I could be completely wrong. I'm kind of glad that nobody is living in their car in front of the building anymore. I mean, if I were living in a car, I would want to do it in a residential neighborhood, because it would feel safer. But as a resident, it made me feel nervous, esp walking the little dog I had late at night. That stupid dog had to go out everynight at 4:00 AM or he would poop on the floor and I could not train him out of it no matter how hard I tried. Poor Bear. RIP.<br /><br />I voted yes on Q and then all of Jean's reccomendations, except no on 60a or 61a or whichever it was, because it has very limitted financial impact and it seems like a pointless thing to amend the constitution about. In CA, we amend the constitution every time we sneeze, but I dunno if that's a good idea. Maybe we could just pass a law instead. If the legislature wants to do something about surplus property, then go for it. Anyway, the right thing to do with surplus property is to convert it into housing so people don't have to live in their cars or in RVs. We're sucha rich country, then why are so many people homeless? It's a disgrace.<br /><br />There should be a Berkeley measure to allow free RV sewage dumping someplace, to keep it out of the gutters and the bay, too. Obviously, the people doing it can't pay for dumping at a pay site, so instead of pushing further financial penalty on them, it would make more sense just to give them someplace to do it and keep the streets cleaner.Charles Céleste Hutchinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18123138871494922485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3808484.post-1099244447344256582004-10-31T17:40:00.000+00:002004-10-31T17:40:00.000+00:00chicken bones? what do you think that's about?
olg...chicken bones? what do you think that's about?<br />olgaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3808484.post-1099166700739449982004-10-30T21:05:00.000+01:002004-10-30T21:05:00.000+01:00Hi, it's Polly!
The Greens of San Mateo County sa...Hi, it's Polly!<br /><br />The Greens of San Mateo County say no on 60a, no consensus on 61, no on 65, yes on 67 & no on 71.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3808484.post-1099153665795408852004-10-30T17:27:00.000+01:002004-10-30T17:27:00.000+01:00got my ballot right here (i walk it into my pollin...got my ballot right here (i walk it into my polling place on tuesday).<br /><br />60a yes, 61 no, 65 no, 67 yes, & 71 yes. either barbara lee's recommendations or my own take on who was in favor and opposed in the voter handbook.Jean Siriushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13614341661136193624noreply@blogger.com