I had been thinking queer visibility was really low here, but then I saw two lesbians (you know what i mean) on tuesday and a queer looking womean today and I thought I saw three drag queen on tuesday also, but then today I was looking at a picture of Camilla Parker Bowles (the royal person currently visitting america) and I thought she was a drag queen. While this would explain why the royal family wouldn't initially let charles marry her, I can't beleive they tabloid press wouldn't have picked up that story by now. I think I have my queer meter set on over-sensitive.
But at least one of the people I spotted really was a TG hooker, wearing these incredible clear plastic platform shoes, big enough to keep goldfish in and wearing a metal belt with bells on it that rang when she swung her hips. I could fall in love with a girl like that if I weren't already in love with a girl not like that. As Lynn Breedlove once sang, "I'm a tranny chaser. Give me chicks with dicks. I'll bring them beer and dasies. And lollypops to lick."
I said something to a guy at school about how Joan of Arc was burned at the stake for cross-dressing and he said, "You must feel very proud."
For her martyrdom, he meant. I guess I'm not very subtle.
Princess Di was totally hot. I don't know what was Charles' problem.
1 comment:
The excellent reference book _The History of Lesbian Hair_nis somewhat out of date, alas. I don't think there are plans for a new addition.
It is the hair that gives them away, but this is very very regional. It took me a long time to recognize lesbians in Connecticut, before I realized that they looked just like lesbians in San Francisco did in 1992.
The "queer looking woman" I described did indeed have lesbian hair. I think that if I go to the gay district for a haircut, things may become clearer.
Its funny how people run around trying to find themselves (I've done it too) when really, wherever you go, there you are.
Post a Comment